On May 10, 2025, the long journey of the failed Soviet Venus lander has finally come to an end. The Kosmos 482 probe crashed to Earth after orbiting our planet for more than five decades. Reentry occurred at 2:24 a.m. ET (06:24 GMT or 9:24 a.m. Moscow time) over the Indian Ocean, west of Jakarta, Indonesia, according to Russia’s space agency, Roscosmos.
Fortunately, Kosmos 482 appears to have fallen harmlessly into the sea. However, this is just one estimate. Other space agencies and tracking organizations predicted different reentry locations, ranging from the South Asian mainland to the eastern Pacific. It remains unclear when or if we will receive a definitive answer regarding where Kosmos 482 came down.

Due to growing concerns, NASA warns that Low Earth Orbit (LEO) has become “the world’s largest garbage dump”, containing nearly 6,000 tons of debris. Since orbital lanes are a finite resource, every new fragment raises the risk of collision. Satellites provide vital services, including weather data, global communications, navigation, and scientific observations, making the protection of these orbits essential for modern society.
The problem!
By official count, about 40,920 objects are currently catalogued in Earth orbit. Of the roughly 21,320 satellites ever launched, approximately 14,060 remain in space, with only ~11,200 still operational. The remainder are defunct and contribute to the growing debris population.
According to ESA, there are around 54,000 debris pieces larger than 10 cm, 1.2 million between 1–10 cm, and over 140 million measuring 1–10 mm. These range from entire rocket stages to tiny paint flecks. Nearly 95% of tracked debris resides in LEO (below ~2,000 km), making this region particularly congested.
Objects in LEO travel at roughly 18,000 mph (8 km/s), so even the smallest fragments can strike with devastating energy. For instance, the International Space Station has already performed dozens of avoidance manoeuvres to steer clear of debris. Each manoeuvre consumes fuel and disrupts operations, highlighting the persistent and growing hazard.
The space junk problem began with the very first satellite launches. Every mission typically leaves behind discarded rocket stages or payload adapters. Over time, many satellites and upper stages have exploded, often due to leftover fuel or battery malfunctions, creating swarms of fragments. To date, over 650 on-orbit breakup events have been recorded.

Some of these breakups were intentional. In 2007, China destroyed one of its own Fengyun weather satellites in a missile test, creating over 3,000 new pieces of debris. In 2009, a derelict Russian satellite collided with an active US Iridium satellite, producing roughly 2,000 fragments.
In recent years, commercial activity has added to the load. Thousands of small satellites are now being launched in large constellations, increasing congestion in key orbital zones. As former ESA Director General Jan Wörner noted, this “new space” era marked by mega-constellations for global connectivity could “dramatically increase the chance of collisions”.
In short, over decades of launches, explosions, and collisions, we have steadily filled Earth’s orbits with dangerous debris.
Debris presents serious and escalating risks
Debris presents serious and escalating risks. Even fragments as small as a millimetre can pierce spacecraft shielding at orbital velocities. A single collision could disable a satellite or endanger a crewed mission.
Although most recorded strikes have caused only minor damage, operators must invest additional fuel, planning, and resources to track hazards and conduct evasive manoeuvres. In one recent example, the ISS adjusted its orbit in November 2024 to avoid a tumbling satellite fragment.
If a high-value satellite were lost, essential services including communications, GPS, and weather forecasting could be disrupted, leading to major economic and societal consequences.
Worse still is the spectre of the Kessler syndrome: a cascade of collisions that produces more debris, increasing the likelihood of further impacts. International agencies have warned that debris levels are rising at an exponential rate as satellite traffic surges.
Without intervention, parts of LEO could become unusable, threatening future space missions and the Earth-based systems that rely on satellite infrastructure.

While debris from defunct hardware is already a serious concern, the rapid expansion of satellite constellations is intensifying the issue. Thousands of new satellites are launched annually into Low Earth Orbit (LEO), increasing congestion and the risk of collisions.
Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite internet project, has deployed over 6,000 satellites as of 2025, with plans to expand to 42,000 in dense orbital shells between 340–550 km. Amazon’s Project Kuiper aims to launch 3,200 satellites, with half operational by 2026.
China is accelerating its efforts through the Qianfan project, targeting to send 15,000 satellites by 2030, while a private Chinese firm, Geespace, plans 6,000 more. Europe’s OneWeb (now integrated with Eutelsat) and the EU’s IRIS² initiative are also adding hundreds of satellites for broadband and digital sovereignty.
These mega-constellations offer global connectivity but drastically increase orbital crowding. Without coordinated planning, sustainable design, and effective end-of-life protocols, the influx of active and inactive satellites risks triggering more collisions, signal interference, and long-term orbital instability.
Balancing innovation with responsibility is now a defining challenge of the space era.
Voluntary guidelines to regulate Debris
To address the growing debris threat, space agencies have issued voluntary guidelines. The Inter-Agency Debris Committee (IADC) introduced mitigation recommendations in 2002, including deorbiting satellites after use and passivating fuel tanks. These non-binding guidelines have shaped national policies worldwide.
In 2019, the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) adopted Long-term Sustainability Guidelines to align global practices. Agencies in the US, Europe, and Japan now require deorbit plans and debris avoidance measures for new satellites.
Ground-based systems like the U.S. Space Surveillance Network monitor orbital objects and issue collision alerts. However, no binding global treaty mandates debris removal, compliance remains voluntary and operator-specific. The focus remains on preventing new debris, improving satellite design, and avoiding collisions.
Current efforts to save the Earth!
Governments and private companies are advancing debris mitigation and removal. The European Space Agency (ESA) is enhancing orbital models and planning active cleanup missions like ClearSpace-1, which will capture and deorbit a defunct satellite. Other missions, such as RemoveDEBRIS, have tested nets, harpoons, and robotic arms for debris capture.
Companies like Astroscale are developing autonomous docking technologies, while passive solutions, like drag sails and tethers, help accelerate satellite reentry. Improved materials are also being explored to minimise surviving debris.
Efforts on Earth include better space traffic coordination and real-time data sharing among operators.
The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA), through COPUOS, promotes international cooperation, responsible behaviour, and policy harmonisation to support sustainable space operations.
Future innovations and action
Looking ahead, experts agree that technological solutions alone will not be enough. Innovation must be coupled with robust cooperation and policy frameworks.
Emerging ideas include on-orbit servicing, i.e., refuelling or relocating ageing satellites, laser nudging from ground stations or orbital platforms to alter debris trajectories, and fully integrated space traffic management networks to oversee satellite operations globally.
Incentive-based approaches are also gaining traction. A proposed Space Sustainability Rating could score satellite operators on their debris mitigation performance, encouraging accountability and transparency.
As Jan Wörner noted, while mega-constellations offer great promise, they also threaten orbital safety without adequate safeguards. “Innovative technologies, responsible behaviour, and importantly, international cooperation are fundamental to ensuring our future in space is sustainable.”
Former UNOOSA chief Simonetta Di Pippo echoed this warning: “Space debris poses a clear risk for the long-term sustainability of outer space activities,” stressing the need for a secure and cooperative orbital regime.
In short, the time to act is now. Without stronger laws, cleaner technologies, and international alignment, the long-term viability of Earth’s orbital environment is at stake. Governments, industry, and civil society must move swiftly to preserve space as a shared resource for this generation and those yet to come.
References:
- https://www.npr.org/2024/11/20/nx-s1-5196986/iss-dodge-debris
- Space Environment Statistics · Space Debris User Portal
- https://sdup.esoc.esa.int/discosweb/statistics/
- UNOOSA and ESA release updated infographics about space debris
- https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/informationfor/media/unoosa-and-esa-release-infographics-and-podcasts-about-space-debris.html
- Space Debris – NASA
- A Brief History of Space Debris | The Aerospace Corporation
- https://aerospace.org/article/brief-history-space-debris
- New NASA Strategy Envisions Sustainable Future for Space Operations – NASA
- https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/new-nasa-strategy-envisions-sustainable-future-for-space-operations/
- nasa.gov, sdup.esoc.esa.int, unoosa.org, esa.int
More from the Author: Trump, Musk, and NASA: What does the future hold for Space Exploration?