The Covid-19 crisis has put life on hold. It is speculated that the disease will keep spreading and we will have a hard time getting rid of it unless we get to develop a vaccine. It is a very important task and scientists all around the world are working on its development. It is taking extensive research, time, and ideas and resources. But giving up hope will not be the solution; it is important to stay committed and wish for the best.
During such times, it comes as a moment of great pride that a vaccine by a Pakistani scientist and his team in the UK has been listed and selected by the World Health Organization.
Dr. Muhammad Munir recently announced on social media, that the vaccine being developed at Lancaster University is now on the WHO landscape.
A virologist and a veterinarian, Dr. Muhammad Munir, has research experience on virus pathobiology, viral antagonism of immune responses and factors of hosts that can hinder and limit the replication of viruses. He is a lecturer in Biomedicine at Lancaster University. He has been discussing his opinions and views on the different kinds of measures and their efficacies on various media outlets since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease. He recently announced on social media, that the vaccine being developed at Lancaster University is now on the WHO landscape of Covid-19 candidate vaccine.
WHO is closely working with research groups and listing various labs across the world that are working on this task. This is one of the biggest projects in modern history and is required for eliminating the deadly virus that has been creating havoc all around the globe, once and for all. More than 100 vaccines are in pre-clinical trial and around eight are in clinical trials.
But this is going to take quite some time to develop. It is a fairly challenging task and a long way lays ahead. According to Dr. Munir “The most realistic timeline is that we won’t have a Covid-19 vaccine in 2020”.
We can only hope and support our scientists and health workers in this endeavor. The capability of humans is enormous and by working together, we can bring our lives back on track.
Since January 2020, when Coronavirus started spreading in Wuhan, China, and later massively trapped the U.S. and European countries, researchers around the globe, have been racing for an effective cure. By the First week of May 2020, more than 90 vaccines are being developed against COVID-19 by the researchers in pharmaceutical companies and universities across the world. Researchers are trialing different technologies, some of which haven’t been used in a licensed vaccine before. At least six groups have already begun injecting formulations into volunteers in safety trials; others have started testing in animals.
Scientia Pakistan Magazine has interviewed Dr. Michael Gale, Jr., Ph.D. Director of the Centre for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease (C.I.I.I.D.), in the U.S. The C.I.I.I.D. is a research center for immune responses, and viruses and infectious diseases, including coronaviruses. Our senior team member Fawwad Raza and Dr. Micheal discussed how the pandemic has catalyzed the development of novel coronavirus vaccines across the biotech industry, both by pharmaceutical companies and research organizations.
Below are some excerpts of this conversation.
Fawwad: What are the biggest threats of Covid-19 right now?
Dr. Micheal: One of the biggest questions to understand is how the virus is physically recognized by the body and then how it functions to drive the innate and the adaptive immune response in infection.
We found in the patients that they have a very aggressive immune response that is overwhelming and, in the worst cases, debilitating in that the virus turns on immune processes that are actually contributing to disease.
So, we need to know what those processes are, how they are triggered, and how we can intervene with this type of outcome. So I think those are the biggest questions that we are facing right now.
Fawwad: How is Coronavirus different than the other coronaviruses, such as SARS and MERS? How about the flu?
Dr. Micheal: Coronaviruses are physically different from the flu due to the following specific reasons.
The Coronavirus family consists of viruses that have one long genomic piece of RNA and influenza viruses have multiple parts of nucleic acid, in their genome. That is just one of the significant differences.
Physiologically, the coronaviruses, as a family, circulate around the globe and typically cause what we consider to be the common cold. In any given year, people get infected with what we will call contemporary coronaviruses that cause a cold, runny nose, maybe a slight fever, and some aches and pains for a few days. But people recover from that.
So, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus is SARS that spread out in 200-2003, now this new SARS-Cov-2 is different due to some reasons as it causes very severe and fatal respiratory disease. The current Coronavirus differs from all the other coronaviruses genetically, which gives it its own name.
It is different from SARS-1 because there are multiple genetic distinctions across the genome, and importantly, the spike protein, that gives the Coronavirus its name because it sticks out around the edge of the virus, and makes it look like the corona of the sun if you look at it under an electron microscope.
The spike protein is what attaches to cells and the spike protein from Covid-19- versus previous SARS viruses are unique. It is subtly different, in infection properties. It could be physiologically different, so this current virus has a spread much more extensive and disseminates more rapidly. So the infection behavior is quite a bit different from the previous SARS virus.
And then, of course, the syndrome: The respiratory disease syndrome that it is linked to that we now call Covid-19, that syndrome is different because it is slower in progress. Some patients die. Most people recover just fine.
So the previous SARS was a very aggressive acute infection that was not as widely spread and physiologically created an acute and often devastating disease. Therefore, the two viruses are similar, but they have very clinically different behaviors.
Fawwad: What are some misconceptions about this virus and its spread? And how science addresses them?
Dr. Micheal: Well, the biggest misconception, I would say, is that people are safe and the virus can’t be transmitted that easily. But what we are learning is that it is transmitted very effectively. Science has epidemiology. I think we have, in our own experiences, already proven that the virus is very effectively spread among groups of people through social contact.
So, we had some of the behaviors here in the United States where people were not adhering to social distancing and actually facilitated the spread of the virus when these people should have been staying home and containing the virus on their own.
But we must observe social distancing and use it to stop the spread of the virus because it is very efficiently spread.
Science has shown that the virus can persist on surfaces for specific amounts of time. Science has also demonstrated how we can inactivate the virus through sanitizing procedures. Hand washing is mandatory, Social contact control is very crucial.
If we can stick to those protocols for social distancing, and decontamination adherence personally, and on surfaces, it will slow and even contain the spread of the infection in the population.
Fawwad: You study innate immunity. What do you think is the role of innate immunity for this infection? And why is it important to understand the Coronavirus better?
Dr. Micheal: Yes, a good question indeed. Well, innate immunity is a process that protects us daily, we go throughout our lives. Innate immunity can be considered an immune response on the molecular level that can take place inside of any cell of your body.
If you happen to be out in the public one day and you get exposed to influenza virus, or this Coronavirus, or measles, or mumps, or some new virus that is circulating in the environment, the first thing that is going to happen inside the cells that get infected with that virus is that it is going to induce what we call an innate immune response. When this response works appropriately, it will restrict the virus’s replication at that exact site of infection. The virus won’t get a chance to spread throughout the body and to infect the rest of your tissues and your other organs. Innate immunity is vital for daily protection against viral pathogens in addition to protection against bacterial and parasite pathogens.
Without innate immunity, we become very susceptible to virus infection and an innate response plays a crucial role in controlling virus infection at the site of infection and prevents it from being spread throughout the body.
But when the innate immune response gets turned on too much, it can become dangerous and often turned on when it should not be turned on. This also forms the basis of several different auto-immune diseases that we are familiar with, like lupus, probably multiple sclerosis, and other diseases that can be debilitating.
So we know that innate immunity is crucial to control of infections. But innate immunity itself also has to be controlled.
So, what could be happening, we don’t know this yet, because we need to do more research. But the clinical data suggests that what is happening in [the] SARS COV-2 infection, that underlies Covid 19 disease is an innate immune response. In parallel, the inflammatory response triggered by the infection seems to propagate out of control, and it could be contributing to disease and the lethality of the infection.
So, this could be a situation where we may need to find ways to shut down the innate immune response, or a closure to the inflammatory response, to mitigate Covid-19 disease.
Fawwad: Why are certain people at higher risk of developing a worst [case] disease outcome, than others?
Dr. Micheal: What we are learning is that, with SARS COV-2, affected the elderly most, people over 65 years old, is very susceptible to the infection and is an adverse outcome with the Covid-19. Typically, the aged individuals versus young individuals, there are distinct differences in the capacity of immune response to respond to and control infectious disease pathogens.
We understand this process as part of an aging program in the immune system called immune senescence. It is probably more complicated than that. But what we know is that in aged individuals, the immune response is tuned down, or it switches over more to immune regulation response than a response capable of fast response to an infectious disease. Those people end up being much more susceptible to an adverse outcome than youngsters who have a robust immune response capable of swift action against this virus.
Fawwad: How much can this virus travel in [the] air? And for how much time can it be active to infect human beings?
Dr. Micheal: Yes, the aerosols of the virus are a significant concern. It can survive inside the fomites, and saliva droplets elicited from people when they talk. The virus is probably viable, we think, for several hours in fomites. Fomites get deposited on the surfaces of tables, on your hands, on doorknobs, and anything that you touch. And the virus can survive in that environment, for 30 minutes, to 3 hours, maybe even longer.
That is why it is crucial to decontaminate surfaces and to control the aerosol spread of the virus. You see many people walking around with a mask on their face, to control the spread. We think that it is essential that people who are actually known to be infected, if they are around other people, to wear a mask. If you are not infected, the important thing is to make sure the surfaces you touch are clean, or you are maintaining social distancing to reduce exposure to aerosols coming from someone infected.
Fawwad: As some research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, warns that the current guidelines are based on outdated models from the 1930s. How much distance is safe from one person to another? 3, 6 feet, or 20 feet?
Dr. Micheal: Yes, this is right, it can be risky. So the best data suggests that six feet of distance, or about two meters, is better than three feet. This is the distance by which fomites: again the aerosol droplets that would contain a virus, travel when people talk.
Some people talk louder than others, so when they speak louder, they expel more air. And that is why maintaining a six-foot distance is better than three feet. Now, on the other hand, when people sneeze, or if somebody is talking underneath an airshaft ventilator that pumps air into the room, then that air can spread several feet, much more than six feet. In that case, social distancing beyond six feet, as you mentioned, 20 to 27 feet, is worth considering.
As I sit here today, there is an air vent above me, blowing air into my room. When I talk, somebody who is sitting across the table would be more apt to be exposed to aerosols that I am exuding. If I were infected, this act could be hazardous, and that air vent above me would blow the air past me many feet, greater than six feet.
That is why it is mandatory to maintain a distance, depending on the configuration of your room, six feet or higher.
The best data suggests that six feet of distance, or about two meters, is better than three feet
Fawwad: Some researchers claim that COVID-19 has mutated. And it can mutate from one person to another. Is that true?
Dr. Micheal: Well, there could be some truth to that, so, what happens with viruses that have RNA genomes, when they replicate they don’t proofread their genome, which is very different from viruses with DNA genomes.
The genome of humans is a DNA genome; we make RNA from that DNA genome as we turn our genes on. But these RNA viruses have an RNA genome. When the cells in our body replicate, our DNA genome undergoes proofreading. And if there are mistakes in it, we have repair mechanisms that correct those mistakes, typically.
RNA viruses don’t proofread, they don’t have much proofreading capacity that DNA viruses have. So they make a lot of mistakes when they replicate.
The coronaviruses have other ways to select for maintaining genome integrity. But overall, they don’t proofread when they replicate. So that can lead to the accumulation of mutations that eventually could drive the outgrowth of a new virus strain.
Now there is not a lot of evidence right now; that what is happening in real-time with Coronavirus. Although from patient to patient, there could be new mutations that accumulate to make the virus more fit for that particular patient.
We don’t fully understand that yet because we haven’t done enough experiments to sequence the genome from different patients across this outbreak. But we know from other RNA virus pandemics including HIV, Hepatitis C. virus, for example, that there is a lot of genome mutation that takes place as the virus replicates and adapts to a new person that it infects.
So, we should expect to see some genetic variation in Coronavirus across the globe as it propagates across populations.
Fawwad: Can blood plasma treatment helps to boost the infected patient’s immune system, to fight against Covid-19?
Dr. Micheal: Yes, such treatment is called Passive Antibody therapy, in which we collect blood plasma that contains antibodies from somebody who survived infection and controlled infection eventually with their own antibodies. We transfer that plasma into another infected individual to treat their disease using the previous person’s antibodies.
Passive antibody therapy can be a very effective treatment. It is experimental still. We don’t know how well it works for this SARS-Cov-2. There are clinical studies that are being developed that directly address whether or not passive antibody therapy will be a viable option for treating Covid-19 disease. So, I see this as a potential therapeutic that holds a lot of hope for treating people. But it has yet to be tested.
Fawwad: What are some vaccines and therapies that are being investigated at the University of Washington or other laboratories in the U.S.?
Dr. Micheal: In the University of Washington, several groups focused on developing therapeutic antibodies that are cloning antibodies from patients who have a successful antibody response. They are attempting to produce them in mass quantity for the treatment of infected patients; those are called human monoclonal antibodies.
Besides, the University of Washington is testing two new vaccines. One of them is already in the phase of clinical trials in the local vaccine trial evaluation units. Another one is undergoing testing in a lab. We will soon be requesting approval from the F.D.A. to go into phase one trials. And these are vaccines that can generate rapid antibodies that have the therapeutic benefit of neutralizing the virus upon first exposure. So we are super excited about these.
Across the country, there are also several different vaccines in the pipeline to be tested in humans.
Fawwad: How much time will it take for a vaccine to be approved for mass production?
Dr. Micheal: Unfortunately, it is going to take at least a year or so, and we are probably looking more like at 18 months before it finishes all the trials and gets human approval. Then it has to be mass-produced and shipped around the world. So, it could be 18 months or two years before starting to see a benefit from the vaccine. Let’s hope it comes earlier.
Fawwad: What does the Centre for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, do?
Dr. Micheal: The Centre for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, at the University of Washington, is working very closely with a variety of researchers and also our colleagues throughout the world and in the pharmaceutical industries.
One crucial practice we are doing right now is testing drugs that already have clinical approval for other indications. We are testing them for their ability to inhibit virus replication. The center has got active research going on where we are growing the virus in the lab. And we are taking these pre-approved drugs and treating cells with them to identify those pre-approved drugs that can stop the virus.
Once we identify these drugs, the information will be given back to our pharmaceutical partners, and they will rapidly take that information to the U.S. F.D.A. to request fast track approval for treating SARS-Cov-2 infection.
This process will also take time. But it is much faster than getting a vaccine approved. We hope that the work that is going on at our center will facilitate the delivery of anti-viral therapeutics to the population.
Fawwad: What are some of the opportunities provided by the C.I.I.I.D., and how could Pakistani researchers and physicians get benefit from them?
Dr. Micheal: C.I.I.I.D. has several training opportunities. We have over sixty member labs that bring international students, physicians, and post-doctoral scientists onboard for 3 to 6 months, one or two years to work in the labs and conduct clinical research, basic science research, and interactive, collaborative science. We facilitate them with our research agenda for international partners and of the Centre for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, itself.
In the past, we have had students and post-doctoral scientists, from Taiwan, who studied Entero-virus 71, Entero-virus 68 infection those commonly spread across Asia.
We have had scientists from Brazil, who studied emerging infectious diseases. More recently, we had a scientist from France and joined us for a whole year on a Fulbright fellowship to study the Zika virus’s innate immunity.
This leads to a vibrant interaction which is loaded with training opportunities in infection and immunity, emerging infectious disease, and in translational medicine to identify therapeutics and bring them into the clinic. These opportunities are available through international partnerships in our center.
We are currently working with the Zika virus, Entero-virus 71, SARS-Cov-2, and other contemporary coronaviruses, along with HIV, SIV, Hepatitis B., Hepatitis C., Influenza A virus. We have previously completed some projects on Hantavirus. And we have an ongoing study developing the HIV vaccine that ideally will be in clinical trials soon, with colleagues at Oregon House Sciences University. So these are fascinating studies that are ongoing.
The interview is compiled by Aniqa Mazhar, a team member of Scientia Pakistan magazine.
Black holes are considered as the apex of astronomical curiosities that we humans have garnered for the last few decades. Last year we even succeeded in capturing an image of a black hole for the very first time since its conception. Why are we so obsessed with the black holes?? The answer lies in the obscurity of these gravitational giants. The secrets about the beginning of space and gravity are believed to lie beyond the horizons of these black holes. Humans have been delayering these secrets in order to find out what truth lies inside the core of a black hole.
A number of attempts have been made towards discovering the existence of black holes in our Milky Way galaxy and other distant galaxies. So far, we have been discovering a number of black holes in the far away galaxies but to our surprise, a black hole has been recently found right in our cosmic backyard. It’s a surprise because despite its existence being so close to our solar system, we haven’t been able to notice its existence yet.
Artist’s impression shows the orbits of the objects in the HR 6819 triple system. This system is made up of an inner binary with one star (orbit in blue) and a newly discovered black hole (orbit in red), as well as a third star, in a wider orbit (also in blue). Credit: ESO/L. Calcada.
A team of astronomers from the European Southern Observatory (ESO) in collaboration with other institutes examined a triple star system (a star system comprising three stars in a formation that the two stars orbit it other in smaller orbits and the third star orbits around the inner pair in an outer bigger orbit). Initially, upon analysing the observations of the system called HR 6819, as a part of their study of double star systems, they revealed a previously undiscovered body in the HR6819: a black hole. This path-breaking discovery was made at the ESO observatory at La Silla, Chilli through its MPG/ESO 2.2-metre telescope. The observations with the FEROS spectrograph on the telescope showed that one of the two visible stars orbits an unseen object every 40 days, while the second star is at a large distance from the inner pair.
The unseen black hole in the HR6819 belongs to the family of the very first stellar-mass black holes found that do not interact violently with their surroundings and thus accretion (disk formation) is seen around them, therefore, are called nonaccreting black holes as they appear truly black. However, its presence could be spotted and its mass could be calculated by studying the orbit of its companion star in the inner orbit. According to the theory of stellar mass limits, this invisible body fits the definition of a black hole as it has a mass four times that of the sun. According to Thomas Rivinius, Emeritus Astronomer based in Chilli, “an invisible object with a mass at least 4 times that of the sun can only be a black hole.”
The black hole found in the HR6819 is special in a way that it doesn’t react to its environment. Out of a couple of dozen black holes found in our galaxy strongly interact with their environment and make their presence known by releasing powerful X-rays. But, after the discovery of an invisible black hole, it is estimated that, over the Milky Way’s lifetime, a significant number of stars ended up as black holes as they died. Their locations in the Milky Way can now be traced by the clues that this discovery of an invisible black in the HR 6819 has provided. As Rivinius shares, “There must be hundreds of millions of black holes out there, but we know about only a few. Knowing what to look for should put us in a better position to find them.” This can be well understood as the fact that this discovery is just the ‘tip of an iceberg’.
This chart shows the location of the HR 6819 triple system, which includes the closest black hole to Earth, in the constellation of Telescopium. Credit: ESO, IAU and Sky & Telescope.
As science lovers, we must find this discovery as a ticket to a roller coaster that runs across the deep drown secrets of our Milky Way galaxy and way into an unbridled ride of the cosmic ocean. We must understand and observe the might of gravity and the phenomena it is capable to cause. The discoveries of these triple star systems (HR 6819) provide clues about the violent cosmic mergers that release gravitational waves strong enough to reach our planet Earth. Astronomers believe that studying these systems could help them understand how stellar collisions can happen in these systems. According to Marianne Heida, a postdoctoral fellow at ESO, “by finding and studying the triple star systems like HR 6819 or LB-1, we can learn a lot about the formation and evolution of those rare stars that begin their lives with more than about 8 times the mass of the Sun and end with a supernova explosion that leaves behind a black hole.” The existence of this invisible black hole so close to our home has paved way for the possibilities for many more surprises to come in the near future. Who knows, maybe we can find a black hole right in our backyard someday.
In this time of perplexity, when a sense of foreboding is prevailing everywhere around the globe, it is not an easy task to step ahead and works as the frontline fighters. Amid this coronavirus pandemic, healthcare professionals are serving humanity at the expense of their own lives.
Pakistan, with no exception, is also facing the same crisis, with less than minimal resources and an underfunded healthcare system. Amid the chaos, the ones leading from the front are our caregivers, our national heroes. This not only demands to risk your own life but also the life of your loved ones in honor of the commitment they made to their profession, undeniably this requires huge sacrifices and courage.
With more than 1000 health professionals tested positive for corona, these doctors still are doing extraordinary service even without the protective gear and the essentials needed to minimize their exposure to the virus. With our health care system being extremely fragile, sloppy and not able to resist havoc like this- having less than 15000 ventilators in total, and not enough space to accommodate the patients, these warriors not only make themselves vulnerable to the virus by stepping out but also make tough calls deciding who gets a chance to live and who will be left to die; taking a toll on their mental health.
Dr. Zahra Jaan, is one of our white cap heroes, serving in Hayatabad medical complex in the Gynae department. Peshawar being the epicenter of this pandemic outbreak in KPK, Dr. Zahra, has volunteered in the combat team for COVID-19 too. In this dire situation, being responsible for not one but two lives demands an exceptional level of vigilance; we cannot overlook her tremendous courage to take this burden on her shoulders and stand steadfast in the face of this calamity.
Dr. Zahra Jan is a trainee in gynae and obstetrics, Hayatabad Medical complex
To get an insight into the actual situation in KPK, we had a candid conversation with Dr. Zahra Jaan, a qualified doctor and a brave lady. She is serving her people with no fear amid coronavirus breakdown. Here are some excerpts of the conversation:
Sabeeka: During this pandemic, where everyone is freaking out being caged in the houses and gazing empty streets from their windows. Take us into what it is like for a frontline warrior who is potentially putting his life as well as of his loved ones at stake in this fight to combat the disease?
Dr. Zahra: Everyone is scared, and it’s quite natural. But for us being at the frontline, this is our job to be in hospitals. Initially, when the cases were not spiked up, we did not have an absolute idea of how things will unfold, but since I am married, I was scared for my family too. After my first duty, I was in quarantine for 14 days, I could not meet my family, and I did not even see my husband for 21 days. They sent us to the hostel near the hospital, so we didn’t use to come home. So yeah, we miss our family, we are scared and fearful.
But even then, this strength comes from within us when we see people suffering in pain, and we realize that we are the only ones after Allah who can relieve them, pacify their pain. It also reminds us of our oath, the commitment to our profession. With the mindset that this is the time the nation needs us, and it makes us strong enough to put our lives at risk to save others. And after they recover, the blessings they give you, that feeling is something out of this world, totally unmatched, jubilant is a small word for that, but that makes you give your all to your profession. Having said that, inevitably, it is a difficult task to step out as a warrior in this whole fiasco full of risks.
Sabeeka: During this hour of crisis, how is your typical day now different from the one before? Do you have to perform “out of hour” service to meet the demands with the increasing number of patients?
Dr. Zahra: Initially, during the pandemic, our elective surgeries and OPD- everything was open, but when the cases increased, only the batch that got duty on a particular day used to come. We used to go for two days a week to limit our exposure. But to meet the needs with the increasing number of patients, they needed volunteers from every ward for the combat team; that condition was entirely different. We have ordered to stay in the hostel for seven days. During this week, we had consecutive duties of 6 hours at different timings-early morning or evening, depending on the schedule. They sent us buses for pick and drop, and then we were self-isolated in those rooms in the hostel, we were not even allowed to meet our colleagues.
After this week-long duty, we were allowed to go homes, where we were in quarantine for 14 days. After that, my regular duty started in the gynecology department. Still, when we return home from our regular duty, we are supposed to remove our shoes, overalls, or any extra thing we have at our gates. Even the essentials we have like stethoscope and phones; we sanitize them regularly with the alcohol swabs, take a shower, and then meet our families. And we don’t take any extra accessories to the hospitals, including our purses.
Sabeeka: As a leading health expert, how do you see the COVID-19 different from other viruses like Ebola, Zika, HIV, and SARS? And what makes an individual vulnerable to the virus, and how can one generally catch the virus?
Dr. Zahra: The significant difference is that it’s very contagious, as we speak of HIV, it is transmitted through body fluids, though it is more fatal than COVID-19. Similarly, when we look at the transmission of influenza, it is one to one. The problem with COVID-19, it is extremely contagious, another distinct feature is its viral load, the one getting infected will have the same viral load as that of the transmitter. It only depends on your immune system, whether it is capable of fighting the provided viral load or not. And the primary means of its transmission are droplets though it’s not an airborne disease, if you sneeze, cough, or even breathe closer to a potential carrier of the virus, you are likely to get it.
Sabeeka: Being a trainee in the gynae department, you are aware of the vulnerability of pregnant women to this virus. What extra precautions is your department taking in this regard?
Dr. Zahra: We make sure that every patient we deal with is wearing a mask and taking all the precautionary measures. On our end, we neither allow more than one attendant with the patient nor do we check more than two patients simultaneously. We have minimized the use of a stethoscope, we monitor fetal heart through machines. Other than that, we prioritize patients if it seems that a patient has come for an antenatal checkup, and there is not anything serious. We can keep them from entering the ward and recommend them home treatment.
But, when it comes to the labor room, we can’t do much as everyone out there is in a critical condition, and there is havoc, but we have tried to distance the beds and everyone in the staff wears PPE when they enter there. The most we can do right now is to ensure their safety and this is what we are doing.
Sabeeka: We have witnessed that the doctors compelled to compromise their safety. With your hospital, are you in the same predicament? How well are you people equipped with the PPE?
Dr. Zahra: With our hospital, our seniors made sure that everyone got their PPE. Although PPEs are not disposable, we have to wash them daily, yet this is the most they can do for us with limited resources. Our buses for pick and drop and our hostels where we used to live were decontaminated regularly, and everything is government-funded. But I don’t think the conditions are as favorable as our hospital in the surrounding hospitals.
Sabeeka: What is the potential protocol for testing the patients? Any vital signs? Have you witnessed any asymptomatic patient?
Dr. Zahra: Initially, we didn’t have our PCR machine here in the hospital. We got our PCR last week, but obviously, we can’t test all of the patients. Our first priority is any faculty member who develops symptoms- we treat them as the suspect of COVID-19, and the next priority is the patients who are vitally unstable with high respiratory rate and shallow oxygen saturation rate like below 96.
Initially, we used to consider their travel history too, but now as the cases in the community are increasing, travel history is not that important. Instead, we test the elderly having any other comorbidities or underlying illnesses. The ones with mild symptoms or no apparent signs having a travel history are registered and recommended to a private hospital for the test, later, the reports are checked. In the case of mild symptoms, we only recommend them to self-isolate in their homes.
Dr. Zahra screening the suspected patient of covid19
Sabeeka: What would you suggest to the potential COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms at-home treatment?
Dr. Zahra: They can take Steam inhalations, Panadol for fever, cough syrup, or spray for throat soreness and incorporate colored vegetables in their food and fruits with a high content of vitamin C like oranges and do exercise to boost their immunity.
Sabeeka: How many tests are you guys conducting per day at HMC Peshawar? Is the government satisfying the needs of the hospital concerning testing kits?
Dr.Zahra: Here at HMC, we used to conduct almost 30-60 tests per day. The testing rate is slower in KPK, which is one of the main reasons that the fatality rate of COVID-19 is higher enough in KPK.
Sabeeka: Are you worried that it is a matter of time that the hospitals will run out of the equipment, masks, ventilators, PPE? Are you seeing the coming days leading us to a catastrophe and the trajectory only going straight uphill? What is your opinion regarding the idea of a partial lockdown?
Dr. Zahra: People have no idea how delicate the situation is, if they keep on with their non-serious, irresponsible behavior, we will no longer be able to control the situation. Talking of our health care system, we have 3-4 ventilators in a hospital. Even in times of normalcy, we don’t have a free bed in ICU in case of an emergency, and we have converted 2 wards into intensive care units already. Where all hale health care units have come down to their knees, what will we do with meager resources and ill-equipped system?
Due to ease in lockdown, we are all set to open our gates to a more severe catastrophe. With the stroke of the curve going upward every day, the coming 15 days will be crucial for us, and unfortunately, people are not dealing it the right way. At the moment, we don’t even know the exact number of potential COVID-19 patients and not even the precise mechanism of this virus- nothing is definite. And unfortunately, we don’t see the trajectory getting flattered anytime soon.
Sabeeka: Many conflicting ideas go viral about the portion of the population this virus is targeting. In your opinion, and from what you see, are the elderly or those with some sort of sickness more prone to the disease?
Dr. Zahra: The coronavirus doesn’t spare anyone irrespective of age, we have even seen cases of newborns infected with the virus. Nothing is going to protect you regardless of your age. You may get mild or no symptoms if you are young and contract the disease, but you will infect the elders in your home who may lose their lives. Yes, you can say that if you are young and you don’t have any underlying illness, you have high chances of recovery as the fatality rate is meager in such cases.
Sabeeka: Several things are being exchanged on social media regarding dugs and treatment to cure coronavirus without any authenticity. What will you say about this self-medication people are practicing and the threats it can pose?
Dr. Zahra: I cannot emphasize enough how dangerous this self-medication can be. People are taking a high dosage of antimalarial drugs for COVID-19 without knowing the side effects they can have likeHydroxychloroquine disturbs heart rhythm. You can have a heart attack while the excessive dosage of Panadol can cause kidney failure. You do not have an idea about any underlying disease or allergy you may have, and any of the ingredients in the medicine you are taking can cause a shock or trigger a reaction in your body.
Sabeeka: Is there any message for the people on civil responsibility they should show to curb the spread of this disease?
Dr. Zahra: Social distancing is the only way to curtail the spread of coronavirus. If you don’t go outside to get the virus, it’s highly unlikely to reach you in your home, so please stay at home. Especially for the young lot, if you won’t practice social distancing, you may not be affected this much, but your elders won’t be able to survive if they contract it. Our health system has already started to cripple, doctors in our fraternity have started getting affected- we are at the cusps of an unmanageable crisis. Take it seriously and follow the precautionary measures. Don’t hide your history, be honest with your health care providers, and don’t hoard as there is an apocalypse waiting for you out there. To take care of others, start taking care of yourself.
The coronavirus has disturbed our daily lifestyle to a great extent. It has also immensely burdened health care systems. Countries are striving hard to find a balance between health-driven lockdown and economies. The sole superpower of the world is alleging that China deliberately released and spread the virus while the third world is endeavoring hard to get some financial benefit out of it in the form of debt reliefs. These macro questions encompass the working of actors in the international system. To understand the development in the world Dr. Afsa Qazi answered these questions upon our request.
Dr. Afsah Qazi is serving as the Assistant Professor at the Department of International Relations, National Defense University, Islamabad. Dr. Qazi is a Ph. D in IR fromthe School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Below are some excerpts of her recent conversation with Scientia’s team member Faryal Qazi.
Dr. Afsah Qazi is serving as the Assistant Professor at the Department of International Relations, National Defense University, Islamabad
Faryal: The U.S alleged China for deliberately spreading this virus. What political and economic benefits would China get on the political chessboard of the world if the virus stays in Europe and the U.S for an extended period?
Dr.Qazi: First, as far as the US allegations vis-à-vis China regarding the deliberate spread of Covid-19 are concerned, these continue to appear grossly ill-founded despite President Trump’s consistent effort to label it as Chinese or Wuhan virus; no logically coherent and scientifically correct trail of Chinese involvement has so far been identified. Second, the very understanding needed to fight this pandemic globally is to internalize the fact that it does not benefit anyone, either in short or long run.
When considering that a particular state might have knowingly spread the virus to the rest, it must also be realized that in an intensively interconnected and interdependent world that we have today, what goes around comes around even faster. That said, looking at what in common parlance is known as the Chinese miracle, had been achieved by getting China integrated into the world markets, especially with the developed ones in the U.S and Europe.
Therefore, even if China wishes to get back to normal (as businesses and industries in China reopen) after having controlled the spread of the virus, it would be hard given the double-edged demand shock that market is bound to face due to a decrease in global demand (lowering Chinese exports that might continue if western economies do not get back to normal) and a contraction in domestic spending (due to record high levels (6.2%) of unemployment and psychological stressors inside China). The only political advantage for China might be a better global image for dealing efficiently along with helping others fight the pandemic – again which the war of narrative being led by the US continuously tries to hinder.
Faryal: Fighting this global pandemic measures taken by autocratic countries like China, North Korea, and Russia were better and Speedy. In fact, China is a role model during this crisis, but it wreaked havoc in Europe and the U.S. Does this mean that autocratic regimes are better to deal with such crises, can it be called a failure of democracy?
Dr.Qazi: The observation that non-democracies have dealt more efficiently with the pandemic in comparison to democracies might be correct to some extent, but the generalization is still hard since countries like South Korea, Japan, New Zealand, etc are on the list too. Rather than having an either-or approach regarding the preferred political system, what needs a mention is the state capacity to have the best possible utilization of the resources at its disposal in the times of crises, which in turn depends largely on how states behave/act in times of relative peace when no imminent threats/pressures exist. For example, China’s efforts to transform its huge population or cheap labor into an asset/skilled labor have lasted over decades – this huge skilled workforce, in addition to governmental control and the will to implement policies aimed at delivering public goods (for the sake of sustaining the ruling party’s legitimacy) is what has allowed China to avoid the worst possible outcomes.
Contrarily, the U.S and many of its developed democratic allies in Europe have failed to curb both the spread and mortality rates not because democracies are theoretically or conceptually faulty, but due to the irrational spending preferences of the regimes in-charge, despite the general public desire for better health-care and social security policies across the world.
Faryal: Do you think the U.S is fulfilling its role as a hegemon considering it did not provide any sort of help to affected countries instead it withdrew its pre coronavirus funding from WHO? Whereas, China appears to be fulfilling the vacuum that is left by the U.S. Does the U.S appear as a viable hegemon in the future?
Dr.Qazi: US’ ability to achieve its desired outcomes from emerging situations is for sure on the decline and China is indeed enhancing its image and influence by targeting the areas where the U.S lags. In this context, Chinese proactive engagement and material aid come amidst a lessened American potential for global engagement due to a worsening domestic situation. China’s image and its influence as an alternate public goods provider might improve due to this, however, this is just one of the multitude of public goods that the U.S has appeared to be providing globally for decades.
To what extent China is willing to go for seizing the moment if it really intends to replace the incumbent hegemon (the idea which ‘peaceful development’ narrative tries to negate) will determine who keeps the place at the apex of the system. A hegemonic state is both capable and willing to lead the system; Chinese capability and willingness are both not definitive so far, and how strong or weak the U.S comes out of the ongoing crisis would help find clearer answers to the question.
Faryal: Do international monetary organizations provide debt reliefs based on humanitarian considerations as liberals propagate. Or is it again interplay of power politics that drives the condition of these relief packages? What is your IR expert opinion based on the debt reliefs provided by IMF?
Dr.Qazi: Two aspects need to be clarified to gauge the work of international monetary organizations. One, they are not philanthropic entities guided by benevolence; instead, they do business with the broader agenda of containing any major upheaval that might turn the interconnected world financial or economic systems upside down. Even if a bail-out is given to rescue the fate of a country’s population, the state bears responsibility and has to pay the price for such favor – so bail-outs always have a give and take involved. Second, IMF has a reserve currency pool that consists of funds deposited by states; the larger a state’s reserve in the IMF, the greater its quota and greater the voting share, thereby making that state’s stance important to deciding for or against a requested bail-out.
This is where power-politics might have an influence, but again, decisions are not taken unilaterally. As far as the issue of conditions on relief packages are concerned, the IMF being a formal organization follows a rule-based approach in this regard rather than following any particular state’s preferences. This is to say that several categories of relief packages have been defined and mandated under IMF – the general rule follows that more substantial the amount being requested and weaker the economic credentials of the requesting state, stricter the conditions. So, conditionalities have something to do with the track record and economic performance of the states asking for bail-outs. However, since the member contributions make up the IMF’s reserves, when the USA, having the largest reserve withdraws them, there are cuts on the organization’s overall reserve, thus constraining its capacity to bail-out.
Dr Salman Hameed is Charles Taylor Chair and Associate Professor of Integrated Science & Humanities in the School of Cognitive Science. He is also the director of Center for the Study of Science in Muslim Societies (SSiMS). He holds a Ph.D. in astronomy from New Mexico State University at Las Cruces and a B.S. in physics and astronomy from the State University of New York at Stony Brook.
His primary research interest focuses on understanding the reception of science in the Muslim world and how Muslims view the relationship between science & religion. His other research interests include analyzing reconciliation efforts over sacred objects and places of astronomical importance. His past astronomy research focused on understanding star formation in spiral galaxies.
Dr Salman has taught courses on “Evolution, Islam, and modernity”, “Science in the Muslim world”, “Creating science fiction short films using real science” (with Dr. Jason Tor), “Science & Religion: Biological evolution in the public sphere”, “Aliens: Close Encounters of a Multidisciplinary Kind” and “History and Philosophy of Science & Religion” (with Dr. Laura Sizer) at Hampshire College.
We got a chance to have a conversation with him during this lockdown. Following are parts of the conversation:
Abdullah: You were born and raised in Karachi. Let us know about your academics?
Dr. Salman: I did my Matric from Bai Virbaiji Soparivala Parsi High School (B.V.S.P) and then my Intermediate from D.J. Science College. I did not know I will be pursuing astronomy later on, but my interest was always towards the sciences. After my Intermediate, I got into N.E.D. Engineering University in Mechanical Engineering program. I only spent a month there before leaving for the State University of New York at Stony Brook. I was admitted into the Computer Science major, but I soon discovered that I was spending all my time in the Earth and Space Sciences Library.
To the consternation of my parents, by the end of my first year of undergraduate, I switched my major to astronomy and physics. It was tough, especially the physics part, but my love for astronomy encouraged me to accept this challenge. After my bachelor’s, I moved to New Mexico State University (NMSU) in Las Cruces for my Ph.D. The night sky in New Mexico is amazingly dark, and it was perfect for doing astronomy.
Carl Sagan’s “Cosmos” was a huge source of inspiration for Dr. Salman
For my doctorate, I looked at how stars form in spiral galaxies. To do this, I was lucky to use some of the world’s best telescopes in the US, Chile, and Spain. It was awe-inspiring to visit these stunning places to explore questions about galaxies millions of light-years away. I should mention that when visiting these places, I would mostly be listening to Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan, and his music in my mind is now inextricably tied to these places.
Abdullah: How did you get interested in Astronomy?
Dr. Salman: I was always interested in staring up at the stars. But what reshaped my life was the airing of Carl Sagan’s “Cosmos” on PTV in 1984. I was in 9th grade at the time. Before that, I did not know that one can go with astronomy as a profession. Just imagine: Working full time on your favorite hobby! At the end of the first episode, I had decided that I want to be an astronomer. And 17 years later (!) I got my Ph.D. I never got a chance to thank Carl Sagan as he died in 1996. But I did meet his widow, Ann Druyan, and conveyed my thanks to her.
Abdullah: You were among the pioneer astronomers who established Amateur astronomers’ society of Pakistan (Amstropak) in 1987. Let us know about its achievements?
Dr.Salman: Today we have a thriving amateur astronomy scene in Pakistan. At the time, however, we starved even for basic astronomy information. This was the reason why a few of us – all under the age of 17 – formed an amateur astronomical society in Karachi. We started a newsletter that provided astronomy basics and hosted symposia on Mars, Supernova 1987A, and Voyager spacecraft’s encounter of Neptune. The symposium on Mars included a live teleconference by one of the leading Mars experts, Chris McKay. This was relatively special as this was a time well before the ubiquity of the internet and Skype chats. Apart from the general public, professors and students of Karachi University and the members of SUPARCO attended these symposia. Even though Amastropak ceased to exist in the mid-1990s, I hope that its existence has played at least a minor role in the later blossoming of amateur astronomy societies in Pakistan.
Amstropak conference in 1988
Abdullah: In 1989 you moved to the US for higher studies, how was that experience? Would you like to share your thesis that triggered the research of star formation in spiral galaxies?
DR. Salman: This is a brief question, I will sum up it in two main things that I want to highlight. First, I learned quickly that you have to submit your homework on time. In Pakistan, we were used to cramming for exams at the end of the year. But in the undergraduate program at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, I realized that missed assignments even at the beginning of the semester can cost you your grade. This was a good lesson as deadlines are essential for telescope and grant proposals as well. You cannot submit a proposal even a second late. Secondly, because of graduating requirements, I was forced to take courses in sociology, art, film, etc. At that time, I resented these non-science classes, as I absolutely loved astronomy and felt that this was taking precious time away. However, some of these classes have had a huge impact in making me the person I am today and for that, I’m extremely grateful!
My PhD. thesis at New Mexico State University in Las Cruces focused on how stars form in spiral galaxies and I used telescopes in Chile, Spain, and of course the US. I was looking at particular types of galaxies that are defined by their “bulge” of old stars. Compared to other spiral galaxies, it was thought that these have relatively few new stars forming. However, my advisor and I suspected that in many cases their star formation may be hidden from view by this bulge of stars. We used a technique to subtract out the light from the old stars to reveal substantial star formation an insignificant number of these galaxies. I still had to explain why some of these galaxies are going through this high rate of star formation and I suspected that we are catching them in the act of cannibalizing small galaxies (our own Milky Way has also cannibalized many small galaxies over its history). I found the smoking gun by tracing some leftover signatures of such cannibalization using the Very Large Array radio telescope in New Mexico. I continued this work during my post-doctorate fellowship at Five College Astronomy Department (FCAD) in Massachusetts.
Abdullah: What were the causes behind your keen interest in the way young Muslim scientists view biological evolution and modern science?
Dr.Salman: This has to do with encountering students in my astronomy classes who believed in UFOs. To me, this was surprising and fascinating. These were smart and educated students, and yet they believed in alien visitations. I started to get more interested in how social, political, and cultural factors shape our beliefs. Biological evolution is interesting from this perspective. The idea that species have changed over the past 4.5 billion years of our planet is a fact of science, and natural selection is the accepted mechanism for this change. I learned that in the 9th-grade biology textbook in Pakistan as well and did not see any conflict with religion. And yet, evolution is controversial in the US, but not in most Christian majority countries. In fact, in the US, political affiliation correlates with one’s acceptance or rejection of evolution.
While a lot of research has been done on evolution attitudes amongst Christians, very little research has done for Muslims. Given the diversity of Muslims in the world, from South Asia and Saudi Arabia to Albania, Senegal, and African-American Muslims in the US, it is a fascinating question. It would come as no surprise that there is no monolithic Muslim position on evolution. Even the word “evolution” means different things to different people. From a research perspective, I’m fascinated by the political, social, and historical factors that shape these responses.
Abdullah: Your primary research work focuses on understanding the reception of science in the Muslim world. During the current coronavirus pandemic, Muslim countries like Pakistan and Iran show a severe lack of scientific knowledge even for health and general precaution awareness from an epidemic. There have been problems enforcing lockdowns and a lack of understanding of concepts of social distancing and quarantine. What do you suggest Muslim countries should include in their educational curricula so that the general populations are more receptive to science rather than myths and conspiracies?
Dr. Salman: There are a couple of things to say here. This is not just a Muslim society’s problem. Look at the protests currently going on in the US against social distancing. The problem is that people are looking for certainty in an incredibly uncertain time. This is understandable. There are also real economic concerns for a large segment of the population who do not have the luxury of being isolated and work from home. What you need in this time is strong leadership that trusts science and has an underlying understanding of the process by which scientists are trying to understand Covid-19 and create its vaccine. It would be unfair to bring the Chancellor of Germany into the mix because she has a PhD. in quantum chemistry. But just look at the fantastic leadership shown by the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern. In a time of such global uncertainty, we need good leaders.
But what should be included in science curricula that can be helpful? I think the key would be to understand the methodology of science, including concepts like double-blind tests and the difference between causation and correlation. But most importantly, to appreciate uncertainty. Unlike the popular perception, science thrives when we don’t know the answer. Scientists (at least the good ones) are quite comfortable saying, “we don’t know.” After all, this is precisely the place where exciting research is done. It will be quite dull to work on a problem that has already been solved. Therefore, we get trained to appreciate uncertainty. But we also learn how to solve problems methodically and how to be critical of our results. It is these things in the curricula that can help the public understand and appreciate the process of science.
Dr. Salman also hosts astronomy video series on his YouTube channel, Kainaat Astronomy in Urdu.
Abdullah: I have a keen interest in astronomy since my childhood, and I do believe that seeking knowledge of the heavens helps us to understand the grand mechanism of this universe and universal laws of nature. Do you think that pandemics like Bubonic plague, Spanish flu, and now COVID19 are part of nature’s grand plan to find the “survival of the fittest”?
Dr. Salman: If we go by that logic, then we should not take antibiotics or do any surgery that can save lives. After all, are we not interfering in nature by saving lives via medicine and technology? Second, we are part of nature. We cannot take ourselves out of nature. Whatever we do, by the very definition, would also be part of nature. All of this does not mean that we should not take care of the planet. Humans are the only species in the history that now can wipe out most species on Earth. Our destruction of Earth’s ecosystem can lead to a lot of misery and can potentially lead to our extinction as well.
Abdullah: How would you explain to a layman that Coronavirus is not a curse of Almighty?
Dr. Salman: I think the first thing would acknowledge why people would want to see this as a curse. This is a significant global tragedy, and humans wish to seek explanations and certainty. Unfortunately, a scientific explanation currently provides neither. Instead of a discussion of a ‘curse,’ I would turn to the issue of benefits to humanity. If we can find the vaccine and a cure, then that would save a large number of lives, and this is something consonant with the teachings of Islam and all other religions as well. Second, I would compare plagues to earthquakes. Traditionally earthquakes have been interpreted as ‘punishments’ for ‘sin’ as well. Some of this was brought up after the tragic 2005 earthquake in the northern regions of Pakistan that killed over 80,000 people. But humans now understand how the movement of continental plates causes these tremors. The location of earthquakes strikingly match the boundaries of these continental plates.
This particular knowledge saves thousands of lives each year, as buildings in many of these earthquake-prone areas are designed to withstand the shaking of the Earth. Sure enough, we cannot argue that the punishment from Almighty is only concentrated on people where continental plates meet and onto those countries that cannot afford earthquake-proof buildings? If we can argue that earthquakes are part of natural processes we can possibly extend that analogy to include Coronavirus as well. Not everyone will immediately change their minds and that is okay. But some (many?) probably will. We should not alienate or mock those who do not agree with this viewpoint as some will change their minds tomorrow.
Abdullah: After worldwide lockdown, NASA released very clear satellite images that showed decreasing levels of air pollution across the globe. These clear skies are an amazingly awesome chance not only for astronomers but for amateur stargazers too. Are there any fun ways astronomy lovers can spend their time indoors keeping themselves busy observing the cosmos? How are you spending your time in this lockdown?
Dr. Salman: I think this is a fantastic opportunity to learn about the stars. Even a global lockdown cannot keep the stars out. You can use any basic app (such as Stellarium or Star Walk or Night Sky, etc.) about the location of planets and stars each evening and learn about the objects as well. Venus is bright in the evening sky, and Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn are putting up a show in early morning skies to the east. With your naked eye, you can spot a cluster of stars called the Pleiades and know that you are looking at a collection of a few hundred stars (you can only see the brightest seven with the naked eye) that are all relatively young and are located about 400 light-years away. Our Sun, a long time ago, formed in a cluster like the Pleiades. We do not know where the Sun’s siblings are today. But the Pleiades is a reminder of our own Sun’s youthful days. If interested, you can watch my video on how to identify stars and planets in the night sky: https://youtu.be/lcLA0WGv0nw.
Abdullah: You have been hosting astronomy video series on your channel, Kainaat Astronomy, in Urdu. What is the philosophy behind this initiative?
Dr. Salman: The primary purpose is to create curiosity about the universe in a language that is understood by most people in Pakistan. With the internet, you can find hundreds of videos on any topic. But your language makes a difference. The goal of these videos is not to lecture for a course. Instead, to inspire individuals to think and appreciate how we have come to know so much about our universe and how much more there is to know! Please come and visit Kainaat Astronomy in Urdu: https://www.youtube.com/KainaatAstronomyInUrdu
Since March 20, 2020, most of the cities in Pakistan have been in government-ordered lockdown, including Capital Islamabad. Amid this global crisis, journalists are working round the clock from their homes. The Coronavirus is molding up to be a multifaceted crisis for journalism and media industry, globally. Public health restrictions, including newsroom closures, have imposed limitations on the practices of reporting, and along with the global economic recession, some fresh doubts are casting on the financial viability of several media outlets.
To uncover how International Media is effectively dealing with this situation, our editor-in-chief Saadeqa Khan reached out to Mr. Zeeshan Haider, a senior broadcaster and media professional at BBC World and BBC Urdu. He has working experience of 16 years in digital, radio, and TV journalism and has worked in management, strategic, and operational roles in Pakistan and UK. Currently, Haider is serving as a senior News Editor in BBC Urdu, Islamabad.
“Being a professional in the Pandemic” is Scientia Pakistan’s series of interviews we conducted around the globe to explore how ‘life twisted and how experts/professionals from each field of life are tackling with Quarantine?’
Below are some excerpts of Haiders’ recent conversation, “Being a journalist in the Pandemic.”
Saadeqa: It is not easy to work in pandemic days when there is an outburst of fake News and myths about the virus. I can realize that News editors are playing harder. How lockdown and work-from-home have affected your life being a journalist/broadcaster? Have you felt anxious or overburdened?
Zeeshan Haider: Safety concerns amid the coronavirus pandemic are quickly creating a ‘new normal’ for media workers. For me, this is by far the biggest story I’ve worked on in 16 years at the BBC, and while it’s thrown up personal and professional challenges for all of us, I think it’s one of those career-defining moments that I hope we can all look back on with pride.
As a renowned Indian Journalist, Shekhar Gupta said, common people, are enormously more fearful and less protected than us journalists. They expect us to be around, watching, reporting, editing, recording this for posterity, and blowing the whistle to draw attention to injustices and state failures in the handling of the matters related to Coronavirus.
If I think about the experience of Work from Home, it is an interesting one for me till now. In an office, there are a limited number of distractions, but in a familiar environment like one’s home, it is easy to let yourself get distracted. Initially, It happened with me too, but it’s all good now.
For me running a team digitally is an experience that has been made very easy by the latest tech available to us though, as an editor, what I have learned is that it’s imperative to be realistic about the day to day goals and expectations from my team while working from home.
On BBC Urdu, we are doing our part in the shape of fact checking & reality check stories & myth-buster videos for our audiences along with our regular output. ~Haider
Saadeqa: The growing ecosystem of misinformation has led the WHO to declare an infodemic as a large number of conspiracy theories about the outbreak of Coronavirus are affecting public trust in media worldwide. Why theories like Coronavirus is a biological weapon or pre-planned by Bill Gates on behalf of pharmaceutical companies are getting so much attention, and how could international media cooperate people for not being drawn in such theories?
Zeeshan Haider: In times of uncertainty and worry, it is clear that people are turning to conventional and unconventional News Sources for information, but the question is whatever they are getting is accurate or not or can they trust it. Social Media is becoming the first source of News for lots of people all over the world, including Pakistan and the rest of South Asia. In the age of News based on ‘Forwarded Messages,’ the issue of unauthentic and unverified News is of grave concern for us too.
I think It is the responsibility of Media to bust the myths and conspiracy theories in times like this, and on BBC, we are doing our part in the shape of doing fact check & reality check stories & myth-buster videos for our audiences along with our regular output. We try to make this stuff, especially for younger audiences, as they are the prime users of Social Media.
Saadeqa: The coronavirus anxiety is getting viral worldwide, and we all are feeling that at a larger scale. What is the role of print and electronic media to descend this overgrowing sense of fear in public?
Zeeshan Haider: Media coverage sets the agenda for public debate. While the News doesn’t necessarily tell us what to think, it tells us what to think about. Contagious diseases are scary, and they frighten common people easily. The ongoing outbreak of covid-19 has received extensive media coverage, and the flow of information without proper filters can be a double-edged sword.
In these testing times, media, whether its print or electronic, should refrain from sensationalizing the issue by not using frightening language, and The prominence of fear should not be the primary theme in reports on the virus. Having said that, it is also essential to present the facts and do not hold information from the public on the pressure of govt or other parties.
Keeping the audiences ignorant of the scale of the problem can be counterproductive in times like this. In fact, the current situation is a unique opportunity for the media to play its part in a medium to educate people.
Saadeqa: The UK Govt. announced in Feb 2020 that it would increase the Television license fees from 154.50 pounds to 157.50 pounds for British households. Amid the coronavirus scare and a global recession, how will it impact the BBC viewership and people’s right to information in times of crisis?
Zeeshan Haider: I am not in a position to answer this question. You can contact the BBC Press Office if you need a detailed answer.
Saadeqa: Fran Unsworth, a BBC correspondent, outlined several changes in BBC Newsroom in light of rapidly evolving situations due to pandemic. What changes in BBC Urdu (Islamabad) have been made so far?
Zeeshan Haider: This is a highly dynamic situation, and we have adapted our business continuity plans. We’ve made changes to the workplace to keep our output open and also have pioneered new ways to broadcast from home. Some of our team members perform essential roles that can only be carried out within BBC premises. Other jobs (while no less important) are being carried out remotely.
Vulnerable people who work for the BBC and those directly caring for anyone who is susceptible work from home. This also applies to those who are pregnant. Our aim is to maximize the number of people who can work remotely.
Instead of physical meetings, we are encouraging greater use of video/phone conferencing through apps such as Zoom. We have also arranged special sessions arranged on mental health and resilience in the unprecedented time of this outbreak.
Saadeqa: As per my observation, BBC Urdu always encourages and relies on its local reporters around Pakistan. How lockdown affected reporters’ contribution and how News editors are managing this situation?
Zeeshan Haider: Reporters, whether they are full-time staff or freelancers, did struggle to hit deadlines in the circumstances like these as the sources become a lot harder to pin down, but none of what we do for audiences would be possible without our reporters who are working in challenging circumstances.
Now a days though reporters are mostly working from home, everyone has gone the extra mile and beyond to provide correct and verified information to our audiences. As a News editor, I know that we are in this for the long haul, and with the pressure and reduced staffing levels, we have had to adapt. Further adaptation may be required, and I am continuously looking at the different options – taking account of the views of my seniors in London and my team here in Islamabad as well as the needs of our diverse audiences.
Nadia Bukhari is a British academic pharmacist, and the youngest female fellow of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society: a privilege granted to those who achieve excellence and distinction in their pharmacy career. Further, she was the first Muslim female and the first woman of Pakistani origin to be elected onto the National Pharmacy Board for England. She has authored various titles with the Pharmaceutical Press and mentors students globally.
This interview was originally conducted by an Editor of Scientia- Khola Abid, and lately drafted out by both Khola and Mehwish. We sat down on Zoom with Nadia Bukhari to discuss the role and importance of Pharmacists, and what are the key ingredients that distinguish her from the rest of the crowd.
Tell us something about yourself ?
Nadia Bukhari:I am a very proud pharmacist and have quite a portfolio career. I am an academic pharmacist at the University College London, UK, global lead for gender equity for workforce development at the International Pharmaceutical Federation, and I am the Chief Pharmacist for Pakistan’s leading Telemedicine company DoctHERs. In addition, I am an executive committee member for the Indus Health Network UK, and a trustee for a Pakistan based strategic organization Pakistan Alliance for Girls Education. ; always wearing lots of different hats, but this is what keeps my career journey interesting.
Can you tell us what has been the biggest influence on your career journey?
Nadia Bukhari: When we think of someone or something that has influenced our career journey, we often think of positive influences. However, for me, not only have the positive influences driven my success, but the negative ones also. So, for my positive influence, I would like to thank Catherine Duggan for being my mentor and CEO of the International Pharmaceutical Federation. She guided me through every major step that I have taken in my career; the one piece of advice that I give to all is that having a good mentor is integral for shaping your career to the road of success.
On the flip side, there are many negative encounters that occurred in my life and career path. Those negative experiences really made me focus on myself and pushed me to develop skills of inward reflection which in turn has given me a lot of determination and motivation to focus on myself and my career. So, I also like to thank the negative influencers in my life as well because they inadvertently, also drove me towards success.
Can you give us an example where you influenced and created an impact in the pharmacy profession?
Yes, I am honored to mentor quite a number of young pharmacists.
During the Corona pandemic, Pharmacists have been feeling unmotivated and un-recognized despite being on the frontlines. This was highlighted to me through various pharmacist platforms in Pakistan; I then decided to take this to the media and to use their platform to highlight the important work that Pharmacists are doing during this whole pandemic to the public.
I was interviewed on PTV News24, ARY and Radio Pakistan I spoke about the role and importance of pharmacists, and highlighted the role that pharmacists are playing during this pandemic. This was highly appreciated by the pharmacy community in Pakistan; I received many lovely messages of appreciation. My message to our pharmacists in Pakistan is that I will try my very best to support pharmacists and our profession by ensuring their voices are heard and listened to.
You are the first Muslim female to be elected on the Board for Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain and you are also the fellow. Can you tell us about this amazing achievement?
Nadia Bukhari: A lot of things in my life have been unplanned; if you took me 5 years back, I never thought I would be where I am today. So, a lot of things happened organically; being at the right place at the right time. Being a fellow for Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) is an honor that RPS bestowed to the members who give exceptional services to the pharmacy profession, and there are many things that I have done during my career which culminated to the fellowship, e.g., promoting pharmacists on the global platform, quite a bit of media work, and again around the globe advocating the pharmacy profession.
I am so passionate about being a pharmacist as I always wanted to be one from a young age. Usually, people think that pharmacists are medical school drop-outs; they didn’t get a chance at medical school, that’s why they are studying pharmacy. But, I always wanted to be a pharmacist, and I feel so proud to represent my profession and the passion for the profession always shines through.
Earlier in my career, I practiced as a community and hospital pharmacist. Now, being in academia, I love every single interaction that I have with my students. and am pleased to be a role model for young aspiring pharmacists.
Courtesy: Nadia Bukhari
You also have a philanthropic side and you are a strong advocate of women education. Why do you spend the biggest portion of your time on women’s education and community service work? What does it give you in return?
Nadia Bukhari: I am sure we all have heard about UN sustainable development goals. These 17 goals help any nation develop a sustainable future for all. Two of them that spring to mind: access to good quality education and access to quality health care.
“In my opinion, health care and quality education are the two things that lead to the prosperity and sustainability of any nation.”- Nadia
Pakistan is my country of heritage, though I was born and raised in London, I always wanted to give back. Unfortunately, Pakistan has the second-highest number of out of school children in the world. I was approached to join as an ambassador for Pakistan Alliance for Girls Education. I came on board as I really believed in the work PAGE was doing in promoting gender equity and increasing access to education for girls all across Pakistan. I visited one of the schools, and that visit changed the whole perspective of philanthropy for me. Whilst there, I interacted with the girls and saw how grateful and motivated they were about receiving an education- that just made my drive and determination to come on board as a trustee, deeper. We have 144 schools all across Pakistan which we have opened mostly by fundraising here in the UK.
My second philanthropic project is my work with the Indus Hospital: the only hospital in Pakistan that has no cash counter. I visited the hospital and have also done some training sessions with the pharmacists. I am now an executive committee member for the Indus Health Network in the UK advising on our advocacy and fundraising for the hospital.
My advice to anyone who wants to engage with any philanthropic initiatives:
“One should visit and see the work that has been done first hand, engage with the people that are affected because that really stays with you forever, and it gives you a lot more motivation to fight for that cause.“
During this whole Corona Pandemic, how are the Pharmacists playing their role?
Nadia Bukhari: Pharmacists are experts in medicine. Whenever there is any involvement with medicines, you must always have a pharmacist involved; that’s the bottom line.
With COVID-19, every country is pretty much affected. During the lockdown, the public has restricted access to shops except for grocery stores and pharmacies. Now, pharmacy is considered an essential service, and who is delivering these services? Of course, a Pharmacist. Pharmacists always have been, not just in the corona pandemic, at the front line of health care. One doesn’t need an appointment with a pharmacist and they are easily accessible.
Right now, during this pandemic, doctors are completely stretched and the already strained health systems are breaking. Patients and the public are turning towards pharmacists Apart from medication safety and safe dispensing, pharmacists are advising and supporting patients when it comes to the coronavirus.
During COVID-19, pharmacists worked at the frontline to save lives despite it, WHO couldn’t consider them among health heroes. I wonder if we could discuss the most probable reason?
Nadia Bukhari: This is a very contentious issue, unfortunately, and the problem is we are absolutely on the front lines, but not getting the recognition we deserve, and this is what leads to the de-motivation of our profession. For this very reason, I took to the media to advocate for our pharmacists in Pakistan.
Here in the UK, our health secretary gave gratitude to pharmacists, and this was a great boost for the profession. In Pakistan again Dr. Zafar Mirza- the state Minister for health-also mentioned pharmacists through social media which was highly appreciated by the profession; recognition goes a long way.
The hierarchy within the health system is still there but more so in Pakistan where doctors sit on the top of the pyramid and all other health care professionals come below, and even now in 2020, we haven’t been able to change that mindset in Pakistan. In countries like the UK, we are moving towards more of a seamless integrated care approach where the patient is at the center of everything you do-but when you move towards the lower-middle-income countries you still don’t have that integrated approach.
So, there is still a lot of work to be done and my advice really is that:
Every single pharmacist, no matter where they are in the world, needs to be ambassadors of the profession and make some noise and advocate about being experts of medicines and of the value, we bring to the healthcare team; we need to be the change they want to see.
Use your contacts, your network to start advocating and campaigning on what pharmacists are capable of as we are an integral part of the healthcare team.
According to Dr. Nadia, pharmacists are absolutely on the front line, but don’t get the recognition they deserve
Why did you choose Pharmacy Practice for your Post-grad years? There are loads of other pharmaceutical Sciences as well. How did it become the point of the center?
Nadia Bukhari: I have always been in the pharmacy practice domain. I worked in a community pharmacy and hospital pharmacy. Those years in practice really shaped my career. I was working in a very busy community pharmacy for over a year. That was my first job as a newly qualified pharmacist. It was a very busy pharmacy where I learned a lot from that first job; I met such a broad range of patients. It was a very high paced pharmacy that I worked in, and then I moved on to a hospital as a clinical pharmacist in surgery and musculoskeletal as a ward-based pharmacist going on ward rounds with the clinical teams. So, I worked a lot on my clinical skills when I was working there for three years before I came into academia.
The whole purpose of coming into academia was to bring my practice experiences to the students.
What was the basic motivation behind building a foundation for women in Pharmacy? I am pointing towards National Alliance for Women in Pharmacy?
Nadia Bukhari: 70% of the health force is of women but we don’t see those kinds of representation in leadership positions.
I have been going to Pakistan for about three years now in the work capacity where I am engaging with pharmacy professionals. Whenever I have gone there, I have been received very nicely and very hospitably as well. But, I have only seen the men and the incident that really sparked the question in my head was that photo, I had two years ago, where we had all the predominant pharmacy leaders on the stage and I was also invited on the stage for that picture. I posed the question, where are your women? The numbers that we see as I have just given numbers for the global work health force, that numbers can be translated into the pharmacy workforce as well and in Pakistan, we actually see that anecdotally 80% of the workforce are women. I spoke to Pakistan’s Pharmacist Association- who were very forthcoming and I want to thank them as they have been very supportive in the whole process of launching the National Alliance for Women in Pharmacy.
We need something for female pharmacists in Pakistan to help mentor them, support them, and give them some sort of leadership direction so that they also become leaders. Hence, this notion became the heart for the development of the National Alliance for Women in Pharmacy.
What would be your advice for emerging pharmacy students and for young researchers?
Nadia Bukhari: There are lots of things that I can say, but I think the biggest take-home message is:
“’ Never give up, set yourself goals and try to reach those goals. Celebrate the small and big wins, because when lots of small wins come together that contributes to the big win. Be proud of yourself.’
‘Take a step back and celebrate your wins. You are so busy in just moving on to the next goal that you forget to say:’
‘You know, I actually did a really good job there. Well done!’
‘Give yourself a pat on the back. So never give up, appreciate yourself. Also, have a good work-life balance that’s something we tend to forget and get yourself a mentor that is truly important.’”
Quarantine, aka social distancing, has practically given us a lot of time to spare. Many people are surfing the net for coronavirus, pandemics, and how to cope with them. Luckily enough, there are many fictional worlds built out there, which help us have an insight into the situation. Let me take you through some of them to keep you busy for good enough week. Always remember that whenever you end up catching a cold, there are plenty of things you can account for that are far worse, especially if you live in a horror movie. So here are some movies that revolve around viral outbreaks.
In real life, an outbreak is a sudden occurrence of a disease within a particular place and time frame in which it can affect a small town or an entire continent, whereas within a movie universe, it is usually super lethal and highly contagious, or it just turns you into some weird form of a zombie.
Outbreak (1995)
Director Wolfgang Petersen’s action drama follows Virologist colonel Sam Daniels whose job within the military is to investigate nasty diseases. When a deadly airborne virus finds its way into a small city within the USA, it rapidly starts killing off the local population. Where it is now up to Col Daniels and his team to try and control this viral outbreak.
Outbreak is a tacky film with and an all-star cast. Filled with all the stereotypes and clichés you would expect from the 90’s movies, this film will definitely require your suspension of disbelief at times, with its unnecessary yet fun action scenes and unintentionally funny parts. But overall it is a good popcorn movie, that should entertain and hold your attention throughout.
The Flu (2013)
Director Kim Sung-su’s, Flu is a Drama thriller. After smuggling illegal immigrants into South Korea, a smuggler catches an unknown virus from one of their prisoners. Soon after, the same symptoms start to plague the residents within the suburbs of the city of Seoul, where this new kind of deadly disease can kill a person within 36 hours.
An impressive disaster movie with a rather tense premise, Flu delivers on suspense and action, with very engaging characters. But it does have some tonal issues regarding a few over-sentimental scenes. But despite its minor shortcomings and it is over the top moments, Flu is a pretty entertaining film.
28 Days Later (2002)
Twenty-eight days later is a Sci-fi Horror movie directed by Danny Boyle. The movie starts with Jim, played by the stellar Cillian Murphy, who wakes up from a short-term coma to see that the world has drastically changed. London has become somewhat of a post-apocalyptic zone, and no one can be found. Unknown to Jim, there are plenty of people about it, it is just that they have all become blood-crazed psychopaths or as we may call zombies. The low budget instant classic redefined the zombie genre; 28 days later has loads of horror and terror with just about the right amount of realism. The characters are well developed, the plot: straight forward and haunting and the pacing: tight. Twenty-eight days later, it is very thought-provoking, with a focus on survival and what it means to be human.
Contagion (2011)
Contagion, directed by Steven Soderbergh, is a great movie that is entirely plausible. It is a realistic story about what a worldwide pandemic could look like. Right direction and great star-studded acting all come together to make this movie quite compelling and quite scary at the same time. This movie is hands down unmissable on this list. The way the film portrays the spread of the virus and the resulting symptoms have a striking familiarity with the behavior of COVID-19 and hence relatable on so many levels. This is one of those movies that have become the talk of the town during the current crisis. It might be a fiction when it came in 2011, but after nine years, this fiction has pretty much turned into a reality, and we might be able to learn a thing or two while enjoying it in the comfort of our homes with some steaming hot popcorns.
The Crazies (2010)
He was the last on the list but not the least, the Crazies, a horror thriller directed by Breck Eisner. Set in a small town where everything is pretty standard. Until one day, a man burns down his own house, while another walks onto a school baseball game with a loaded shotgun. With all these crazy events happening, it doesn’t take the sheriff long to figure out that something is affecting the people in his town. Well, shot with plenty of jumps scares, it has a surprisingly engaging story. Tag along this movie to see how the story unravels into something extraordinary.
Now that you have had a tour of some of the most relatable and worth watching movies, get yourself all geared up for the week and start picking from the list by your priority. Do remember to take all necessary precautions, and you’ll be all set for a comfort movie. While munching up on those snacks, I do keenly observe the behavior of those fictional characters and know that we, too, currently are living in the same situation. Now we surely would not want to make the same mistakes so, STAY HOME! WATCH MOVIES! STAY SAFE!
Dr. Nozair Khawaja was born in Wazirabad and completed his Master’s degree in Space Sciences and Astronomy from the Punjab University, Lahore, and the University of Turku, Finland. Later on, he did Ph.D. in Geosciences from Heidelberg University, Germany. He also worked as a postdoc scholar at the Institute of Earth Sciences, Heidelberg University, and is currently working at Freie University, Berlin.
Dr. Khawaja did his research on life beyond Earth and continue to lead his cutting edge research work in association with several space exploration programs within our solar system. In 2019, he got a Group Achievement Award for Cassini’s Cosmic Dust Analyzer from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
He is a recipient of the first prize of the Horneck-Brack Award, at the European Astrobiology Network Association in 2018. He has also received the Short Term Scientific Mission (STSM-2010) Grant from European Cooperation in Science and Technology, ECOST – action chemical cosmos. His work has appeared in highly cited peer review journals like Nature, Journal of Royal Astronomical Society, and Science. He is the founder of the Astrobiology Network of Pakistan (ABNP)-a volunteer network to promote astrobiology in Pakistan.
Here is the brief conversation of Dr. Khawaja with our EIC Saadeqa Khan on the situation in Germany and future of space exploration amid this global economic recession.
Saadeqa: The effects of the Coronavirus on social, moral, and ethical aspects of life will be ever-lasting. Before the virus outbreak, most of the nations were taking environmental threats for granted. As a planetary scientist, do consider the pandemic to be a curse or a blessing?
Dr. Khawaja: We know that in history, there were several episodes of epidemics that changed the course of history and Coronavirus in another of them. So, it has many aspects including ethical, religious, social etc.
You are right that the environmental impact of Coronavirus has overall not been taken seriously in all nations. Among those environmental threats, one was that, since we are not caring about the environment, we may disturb such ecosystems which can result in harm to humans all their lives on this planet. So if you see it from this view, I believe we have been punished for ignoring these environmental threats by mother Earth.
The pandemic is a curse from mother nature. With the advent of science and technology, we are capable of understanding different natural phenomena and have knowledge about different physical and biological processes. Despite that, we harmed the environment and did not care for its natural system. It is a blessing in the sense that now we are aware that one of the reasons for this pandemic is causing disturbance to some living being or some environmental conditions, and finally we will now focus and look into these environmental threats more seriously.
But if you’re talking in the sense that it is a blessing or curse from God, I would say it is difficult to guess. Our response to this situation is basically to get closer to Allah, to take care of people, and to keep a check on our morality. So it turns out to be a curse turning into a blessing!
In another way this epidemic could be a blessing for individuals and on a bigger societal level as well. People now understand that we should be thankful to mother nature as she provided us basic necessities: air to breathe, water to drink and much more for free. Another aspect is that people realized the importance of small things around them which they took for granted. One advantage of this pandemic is in the form of rebuilding and reconstructing of a global society with a sensible behavior towards mother Earth.
Dr. Khawaja is a recipient of the first prize of the Horneck-Brack Award
Saadeqa: Scientific communities and laypeople have long criticized astrobiology or search for extra-terrestrial life. What is your point of view on the current situation, whether spending trillions on space exploration missions would be a sound decision or not when people here on Earth are unemployed and starving to death?
Dr. Khawaja: Many people criticize that the search for extraterrestrial life is a waste of money when on Earth we face problems as dire as starvation, death, and lack of resources. So, why invest in an unseen object (alien life) of which we’re not even sure? Shouldn’t we invest on Earth, where people live?
This is a very valid question, but people ignore two facts here. If humans don’t change their outlook about the existing resources, then our future becomes difficult. It doesn’t matter how many trillions you invest on space exploration and ignoring poor conditions of people on Earth. The quality of life on Earth does not fully depend upon materialistic resources. Firstly, I ask you, how are we humans utilizing our existing resources? So many factors affect the usage e.g. political instability, difference in status and minds of people, discrimination between different sectors of the society etc. In Pakistan, a very backward mindset prevails in society. So, is the famine and lack of resources here because of the fact that the rest of the world is searching for life in space? Most certainly not!
In fact, problems are occurring due to unequal distribution of available resources to different components of the society. I think these issues are related to proactive planning as to how we manage our resources. There should be no objection on life exploration. As a human being, the basis of our mind’s evolution is curiosity. When we follow the few glimpses sparked up in our mind, we discover. These discoveries, in the end, are used for human benefaction.
People don’t understand whether finding alien life may have benefits or disadvantages in the long run. Nothing can be said about it at this point. A benefit is that we humans want to find out our own origin and what the future holds for us. If we find life elsewhere, we can ultimately understand our past and can predict our own future.
We can say that in a situation like COVID-19, we could shuffle the resources from one sector to another temporarily but to fully abandon one area of research for another task is not logical. The main thing is the allotment of resources that should be properly managed. The mirage of man is in his thoughts, working to make them better and to care for the people around us.
Saadeqa: Being a person with a diverse range of interests, I am a keen observer of the environment as well as the latest news in astrobiology. During the lockdown, I observed that Mother Earth is breathing with contentment. We human beings cannot manage without Nature, so, should saving Earth be our priority rather than further space exploration missions?
Dr. Khawaja: This question is somehow connected to the previous one. During this lockdown, Mother Earth is breathing through such components that, we feel, were not witnessed before. In the lockdown, there are indications that environmental conditions are improving because of the low emission of poisonous smoke from man-made utilities and decreasing trends in global warming in general. Definitely, Nature is prospering.
It is true that humans can’t live without Nature. To explore nature is in their blood, I would say. However, if affiliation with Earth is to the point of obsessiveness, it will create problems. Here, I want to direct your attention towards a deeper perception. I ask you to imagine that human beings are aliens on this planet. They came from another place. Why did they leave their place or planet? Maybe it was not suitable to live anymore, which resulted in the migration onto Earth.
Mother Earth regulates itself e.g. circulation of air according to temperature. Earth regulates its own processes, but there must be a threshold present that would have been reached by the previous planet where human beings lived before Earth. Mother Earth may reach its breakdown point. If we are not careful enough, these regulatory processes may lose some of their efficiency and as a result Earth is not anymore mother in its very nature.
What should humans do in that case? Simple: change their attitude. Or else look for a new home. This does not at all mean that they make it a trend; ruining their old home in anticipation of the next one. If humans care, this Mother Earth can regulate itself again.
Exploration is the name of a continuous process. We should allow the basic instinct of exploration to let us carry on this journey. Mother Nature has some ethics regarding the environment and these should be implemented to the maximum level possible in societies in order to minimize damage to the environment. Movements which support this cause should be immediately begun.
According to Dr. Khawaja, exploration is the name of a continuous process.
As an example, if you stop all space exploration and utilize all the resources on Earth, does that mean you would close factories, stop cars for reducing the dangerous gaseous emission and put a limit on technologies? No! it means that these resources will only be useful when our mindset changes. So, to shift resources from one department to another, it is only useful temporarily e.g. we have 20 trillion for space exploration. From that, if we take, say, 1 trillion and invest it in building schools and educational institutes under special circumstances, then that’s okay. But completely banning space exploration and thinking that we are on the road to betterment on the basis of the utilization of that money for some other purpose is not right. Rather, it is against human logic to completely ignore one aspect and put all effort into another. We need to improve the typical thinking habits and perspective of our society.
Saadeqa: To what extent has the pandemic affected future space exploration missions like Europa Clipper? How are your colleagues at NASA and ESA coordinating and corresponding with each other with no conferences and workshops happening?
Dr. Khawaja: Just like the other components of society, activities related to space exploration have also been affected, I think. Regarding on-going space missions, I believe mission-control at different space agencies is carried on as normal as possible because control rooms already have limited access, which should be absolutely fine according to the rules of social distancing. Furthermore, all these activities are tech-based, so most things can be done remotely.
A positive aspect is that people who have huge data from space missions accumulated now have surplus time to analyze it since no office timings are observed. They can concentrate on their ‘home office’, which is a normal trend in the West, with the whole setup easy to switch. Online meetings are attended and focus on data analysis in-depth is possible.
Another effect is in laboratories. They are closed all over Europe with the exception of bio-labs but now it is being thought to reopen and make them functional with a minimum of 1-2 people working at a time only. The pace of future space missions might be affected as well because private industrial sectors are normally involved heavily in such missions. Because of industries being dysfunctional at the moment, or, not fully operational, the preparation time of space missions could have lengthened.
There has been one major effect on the scientific culture, which is in-person meetings between experts on different scientific problems. This culture in the field of science is halted at the moment, which is normally done via conferences in order to communicate science. The commencement of new science culture through online conferences has already been in the process. As you would know there was one of the largest conferences on Geosciences in Europe in April that has to be canceled. Similarly, there were other big conferences planned in America. Abstracts had been submitted, schedules were finalized. But then the pandemic hit and now the situation is that whatever abstracts have been accepted, the organizers have settled the conference online.
They will invite the person online and he or she will make a chat room on the website and people can interact and ask questions over there. This is indeed a quick change of set up on behalf of conference organizers. I can envision that there will be no physical conference in the coming year but technology is already in action and I think virtual conferences will be the future of science. Here, I would like to mention that the Astrobiology Network of Pakistan (ABNP) under my leadership is also planning to organize a first international conference in Pakistan on the subject, and of course, that would be an online conference.
Saadeqa: Before the Coronavirus outbreak, the US was planning its back-to-the-moon mission, the Artemis. Do you think the US will be able to kick-start this mission now while it is going through a historic economic recession?
Dr. Khawaja: You are right, it is understandable that since we could have an economic recession and we are forcing an economic instability, and also the big powers are coming forward, a blame game will start as soon as this epidemic rise is flattened all over the world. This blame game between the powers may further disturb the future of humans on Earth.
In this situation, the US man-mission for space could also be affected. It will have to be seen to what extent it is affected in near future. In my point of view, it can’t be postponed on a long-term basis, but a new schedule could be given.
Anyone can easily foresee that the terms on which the man-made mission was already planned may possibly be a bit changed and extended. It is possible that space agencies prioritize space missions as soon as the situation of COVID-19 is settled. I hope you do know that planetary space missions normally require gravity assistance and multiple flybys of different bodies in the Solar System to reach the destination. This process ultimately needs a particular time frame to launch a planetary space mission and if we miss it, we may not get it again for the next many years. If for economic reasons, space exploration is disturbed, the man-made missions should be the first ones, in my point of view.
But I would like to direct your attention to another point here. Man-made space exploration may become more important because we may become more active and diligent in our search for a new home and there are definitely more chances of it. We should seriously think about not only the betterment of Earth but also where else human acceptability is possible. e.g. subsurface colonies on Mars. Another place could be Saturn’s moon Titan as well, which can provide perfect protection to humans from extreme radiations. So that’s why man-made missions and their importance will increase in this scenario.
Saadeqa: Germany and other European countries became the next epicenter of Coronavirus. How is the situation in Berlin and how long will it take to complete the lift-off of the lockdown?
Dr. Khawaja: Yes, definitely. Germany and other European countries have been the epicenter of this virus. The situation in Berlin compared to other cities and countries is similar in principle. When the German government did lockdown, a lot of the private sector had already shut down to a greater extent. Workers were asked to set up ‘home-offices’. People are obeying rules and regulations announced by the government. There are some irregularities, which are quite understandable as you can see in almost all societies. People here in Berlin are behaving sensibly as compared to people in Pakistan but you cannot find the ideal situation in the world. Being a scientist and academic, like many others in the state of Berlin, I stay at home because there is no way to take the courses in person at the university. However, everything is managed online now.
At the same time, I would say, the German nation is a very broad-minded and independent one, in matters of living, society, culture, etc. capturing that culture in homes is proving to be very challenging. So, in Berlin also, some people did not obey government instructions of lockdown. This disobedience was more in the beginning, but later the government pushed and emphasized them to be locked-down. People are now keeping social distancing very effectively, I would say.
When people go shopping, a line is maintained with 2m distance between two persons, which is quite commonly observed in Berlin. Only a particular number of customers are allowed inside at one time. Similarly, in schools of Berlin, work is being managed very effectively. Children are getting regular homework at home; schools have developed educational apps and give a lot of homework to make children busy.
Now, the government is slowly going towards lift-off, manually, though. For example, at the beginning of May businesses are being opened with strict rules and regulations. Schools are going to open in shifts. The public-private sector is putting a lot of money and effort into finding the cure of coronavirus. It is in the news here that companies started testing some cure on humans. I hope that all these efforts and care Berlin could go towards gradual lift-off.
Saadeqa: What were the reasons behind the massive death toll in European countries due to the Coronavirus? Do you think that Pakistan is dealing with this situation effectively or the situation could be worse in the coming weeks or months?
Dr. Khawaja: One apparent reason for the increased number of deaths in Europe is the accurate data collection in these developed countries as compared to Pakistan where diagnosing the cause of deaths and then tracking them to COVID-19 is very difficult due to the lack of resources.
Another reason for such a high death toll is due to the fact that Europeans and other developed countries, probably, underestimated the spread and severity of Coronavirus in the beginning when the epidemic was contained in China. Probably, they considered this epidemic as a local phenomenon.
As I have told you above that as free nations European countries did not do border control efficiently and also they did not implement social distancing in the early time of this problem. Probably, this is the biggest reason for the increase in the epidemic in these countries.
The question, whether Pakistan is handling the situation seriously has two aspects: First how is the matter handled by the government and second, how is the response of the society to those measures of the government. In my opinion, in such conditions as we observed in Germany, it would be necessary that both (the government & the society) should work together. Only then we can face the situation in a better way. In Berlin, the situation became under control because the government and society both are behaving sensibly and society (with some exception) is following the rules set by the government.
However, in Pakistan, there are many factors that make the lockdown relatively unsuccessful. For example the bad/poor economic condition and the religious discrimination are some of the reasons, which make government’s steps inefficient to tackle the situation. The lack of education and unemployment are also reasons which make COVID-19 issue as a serious threat in Pakistan.
Governments in developed countries, like Germany, announce billions of Euros as a relief package to its people and so far the situation is under control. In my opinion, the government in Pakistan is doing its utmost to tackle the situation and have announced a package for poor people so that they could stay in their houses during this lockdown. In this scenario, we cannot compare Pakistan with developing countries not only at the government level but also at a societal level. I think the Pakistani government is trying to do its best, in this poor economical condition, according to its capacity and economy, but the main concern is that the people of Pakistan are not taking appropriate steps. This may be problematic and prove to be worse for the coming months due to the attitude of the people.
The interview is compiled by Aniqa Mazhar, a team member of SCIENTIA PAKISTAN.
